@article{oai:dwcla.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000773,
 author = {加賀, 裕郎 and KAGA, Hiroo},
 journal = {総合文化研究所紀要, Bulletin of Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies of Culture Doshisha Women’s College of Liberal Arts},
 month = {Jul},
 note = {application/pdf, AN10052143-20140714-33, The main purpose of this paper is to find a clue to create the inclusive history of pragmatism by examining Misak's new study on this subject. The trait of Misak's version of the  intellectual history of pragmatism consists in legitimating Peirce's pragmatism while as degrading James' pragmatism. And also she grasps pragmatism as a part of modern analytic philosophy, not as a development of German idealism. Four subjects are set up in order to achieve the purpose of this paper.
　First we survey the main types of the interpretation of the intellectual history of pragmatism, and position Misak's new research in them. Next, we adjudicate whether Peirce's pragmatism can be justified as representative of pragmatism in general in comparison with James' pragmatism. Third, we critically consider Misak's interpretation of the intellectual history of pragmatism. Finally, we specify the configuration of the interpretations of the intellectual history of pragmatism by analyzing pragmatist's conception of truth.
　Our analysis of these four areas leads to the conclusion that Misak's interpretation can not be justified. We would like to construct the history of pragmatism as efforts to integrate naturalism and historicism., 論文 (Article)},
 pages = {33--57},
 title = {ミザクのプラグマティズム思想史解釈の批判的検討 : 包括的プラグマティズム思想史構築に向けて},
 volume = {31},
 year = {2014},
 yomi = {カガ, ヒロオ}
}