@article{oai:dwcla.repo.nii.ac.jp:00001804,
 author = {福岡, 久美子 and Fukuoka, Kumiko},
 journal = {総合文化研究所紀要, Bulletin of Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies of Culture Doshisha Women’s College of Liberal Arts},
 month = {Jul},
 note = {application/pdf, AN10052143-20200605-82, When courts determine whether the inspections of the students violate the Constitution, what kind of standards should be applied? The United States of America Supreme Court judged New Jersey v. T.L.O., Vernonia School District 47J v. Acton, Board of Education v. Earls, and Safford Unified School District #1 v. Redding. By these judgments, did the Supreme Court establish a constant standard for the procedural right of the students in the schools?
This report reviews a series of lower court judgments wherein the constitutionality of the inspections of the students in the schools became a issue. How Supreme Court judgments were applied to lower court judgments?
Chapter 1 provides a summary of the court of appeal judgments from T.L.O. Supreme Court judgment to Redding Supreme Court judgment, and Chapter 2 provides a summary of the court of appeal judgments following the Redding judgment. In Chapter 3, I reexamine lower court judgments for a deeper understanding of the Supreme Court judgments., 論文},
 pages = {82--102},
 title = {生徒に対する検査の合憲性},
 volume = {35},
 year = {2018},
 yomi = {フクオカ, クミコ}
}